Search

Leadless pacemaker confers similar complications, survival at 30 days as transvenous device - Healio

pandangsa.blogspot.com

Jonathan P. Piccini

Patients who received a leadless pacemaker had similar rates of acute complications and survival at 30 days as those who received a transvenous VVI pacemaker, according to data presented at the virtual Heart Rhythm Society Annual Scientific Sessions.

In addition, patients who received the leadless pacemaker (Micra transcatheter pacing system, Medtronic) had fewer complications at 6 months compared with the transvenous VVI pacemaker, according to the presentation.

“The Micra leadless pacemaker is associated with a two-thirds reduction in complications at 6 months with no difference in survival or complications at 30 days,” Cardiology Today Editorial Board Member Jonathan P. Piccini, MD, MHS, FHRS, associate professor of medicine and director of the Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation at Duke University Medical Center, said during a press conference.

Medicare claims data

In this study, researchers analyzed Medicare claims data from patients who were undergoing de novo VVI pacemaker implantation between March 2017 and December 2018 and had 12 months of data before device implantation. Patients received Micra implants (n = 5,746; mean age, 79 years; 44% women) or transvenous VVI pacemaker (n = 9,662; mean age, 82 years; 43% women).

“The Micra [Coverage with Evidence Development] study ... had three main objectives: to assess the rate of complications between Micra and transvenous pacemakers at 30 days and 6 months, to evaluate the need for device revision and also to assess all-cause survival or all-cause mortality,” Piccini said during the press conference.

The Micra group was more likely to have a higher Charlson comorbidity index score (5.1 vs. 4.6; P < .0001) and end-stage renal disease (12% vs. 2.3%; P < .0001) compared with the transvenous VVI pacemaker group.

At 30 days, there were no significant differences in overall acute complications in the Micra and transvenous VVI pacemaker groups (7.7% vs. 7.4%, respectively). Patients implanted with the Micra had lower rates of device-related complications (1.4% vs. 2.5%; P < .05) and higher rates of cardiac effusions/perforations (0.8% vs. 0.4%; P < .05) and events at the puncture site (1.2% vs. 0.3%; P < .05) compared with those given transvenous VVI pacemakers.

Complications were also assessed at 6 months, during which overall complications were lower in the Micra group vs. the transvenous VVI pacemaker group (3.3% vs. 9.4%). This group also had fewer device-related complications compared with patients implanted with transvenous VVI pacemakers (1.7% vs. 3.4%).

Patients in the Micra group had a 66% reduction in the risk for complications through 6 months compared with those in the transvenous VVI pacemaker group (HR = 0.34; 95% CI, 0.28-0.43). The Micra group also had a lower rate of system revision compared with the transvenous group, although it was not statistically significant (2.8% vs. 1.7%; HR = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.36-1.12).

The Micra and transvenous VVI pacemaker groups had similar rates of mortality at 30 days and 6 months (HR = 1; 95% CI, 0.89-1.12).

Impact on conducting studies

“This study also demonstrates that we can use data from real-world evidence for comparative effectiveness studies without the need for in-person visits to supplement effectiveness data in the general population with respect to new electrophysiologic interventions such as leadless pacing,” Piccini said during the press conference. – by Darlene Dobkowski

Reference:

Piccini JP, et al. LBCT04-01. Presented at: Heart Rhythm Society Annual Scientific Sessions; May 6-9, 2020 (virtual meeting).

Disclosures: The study was funded by Medtronic. Piccini reports he receives support from the NHLBI; receives grants for clinical research from Abbott, the American Heart Association, the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, Bayer, Boston Scientific and Philips; and consults for Abbott, Allergan, ARCA Biopharma, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, LivaNova, Medtronic, Milestone, MyoKardia, Philips, Sanofi and UpToDate.

Jonathan P. Piccini

Patients who received a leadless pacemaker had similar rates of acute complications and survival at 30 days as those who received a transvenous VVI pacemaker, according to data presented at the virtual Heart Rhythm Society Annual Scientific Sessions.

In addition, patients who received the leadless pacemaker (Micra transcatheter pacing system, Medtronic) had fewer complications at 6 months compared with the transvenous VVI pacemaker, according to the presentation.

“The Micra leadless pacemaker is associated with a two-thirds reduction in complications at 6 months with no difference in survival or complications at 30 days,” Cardiology Today Editorial Board Member Jonathan P. Piccini, MD, MHS, FHRS, associate professor of medicine and director of the Duke Center for Atrial Fibrillation at Duke University Medical Center, said during a press conference.

Medicare claims data

In this study, researchers analyzed Medicare claims data from patients who were undergoing de novo VVI pacemaker implantation between March 2017 and December 2018 and had 12 months of data before device implantation. Patients received Micra implants (n = 5,746; mean age, 79 years; 44% women) or transvenous VVI pacemaker (n = 9,662; mean age, 82 years; 43% women).

“The Micra [Coverage with Evidence Development] study ... had three main objectives: to assess the rate of complications between Micra and transvenous pacemakers at 30 days and 6 months, to evaluate the need for device revision and also to assess all-cause survival or all-cause mortality,” Piccini said during the press conference.

The Micra group was more likely to have a higher Charlson comorbidity index score (5.1 vs. 4.6; P < .0001) and end-stage renal disease (12% vs. 2.3%; P < .0001) compared with the transvenous VVI pacemaker group.

At 30 days, there were no significant differences in overall acute complications in the Micra and transvenous VVI pacemaker groups (7.7% vs. 7.4%, respectively). Patients implanted with the Micra had lower rates of device-related complications (1.4% vs. 2.5%; P < .05) and higher rates of cardiac effusions/perforations (0.8% vs. 0.4%; P < .05) and events at the puncture site (1.2% vs. 0.3%; P < .05) compared with those given transvenous VVI pacemakers.

Complications were also assessed at 6 months, during which overall complications were lower in the Micra group vs. the transvenous VVI pacemaker group (3.3% vs. 9.4%). This group also had fewer device-related complications compared with patients implanted with transvenous VVI pacemakers (1.7% vs. 3.4%).

PAGE BREAK

Patients in the Micra group had a 66% reduction in the risk for complications through 6 months compared with those in the transvenous VVI pacemaker group (HR = 0.34; 95% CI, 0.28-0.43). The Micra group also had a lower rate of system revision compared with the transvenous group, although it was not statistically significant (2.8% vs. 1.7%; HR = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.36-1.12).

The Micra and transvenous VVI pacemaker groups had similar rates of mortality at 30 days and 6 months (HR = 1; 95% CI, 0.89-1.12).

Impact on conducting studies

“This study also demonstrates that we can use data from real-world evidence for comparative effectiveness studies without the need for in-person visits to supplement effectiveness data in the general population with respect to new electrophysiologic interventions such as leadless pacing,” Piccini said during the press conference. – by Darlene Dobkowski

Reference:

Piccini JP, et al. LBCT04-01. Presented at: Heart Rhythm Society Annual Scientific Sessions; May 6-9, 2020 (virtual meeting).

Disclosures: The study was funded by Medtronic. Piccini reports he receives support from the NHLBI; receives grants for clinical research from Abbott, the American Heart Association, the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, Bayer, Boston Scientific and Philips; and consults for Abbott, Allergan, ARCA Biopharma, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, LivaNova, Medtronic, Milestone, MyoKardia, Philips, Sanofi and UpToDate.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



"device" - Google News
May 13, 2020 at 11:35PM
https://ift.tt/35Y3qes

Leadless pacemaker confers similar complications, survival at 30 days as transvenous device - Healio
"device" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2KSbrrl
https://ift.tt/2YsSbsy

Bagikan Berita Ini

0 Response to "Leadless pacemaker confers similar complications, survival at 30 days as transvenous device - Healio"

Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger.